tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post6840033368396227283..comments2023-03-27T07:26:57.437-07:00Comments on ObscenityLawyer: Porn Trial: This Time it's ExtremeObscenityLawyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15652268259166107121noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-29152026317739331082012-10-02T01:14:32.254-07:002012-10-02T01:14:32.254-07:00Very interesting post..
filme porno
filme porno ...Very interesting post..<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.filmepornotari.com/" rel="nofollow">filme porno</a><br /><a href="http://www.filmepornotari.com/" rel="nofollow">filme porno gratis</a>Amarjeethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06185020189377286935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-68143164752404218462012-09-22T14:29:44.707-07:002012-09-22T14:29:44.707-07:00I would have thought that after the Peacock trial ...I would have thought that after the Peacock trial the CPS would rethink its position on trying to get Fisting classified as Extreme Pornography.I can only wonder how far the are willing to go, how many others they are willing to 'put through the mill' on charges like this. What will have to happen before the government finally rethinks this 'politically motivated' new law. Lore Rueshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15006904750821788711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-70596076383243451802012-08-13T02:29:29.224-07:002012-08-13T02:29:29.224-07:00...or firing a gun at her right breast, away from ......or firing a gun at her right breast, away from the heart...Ron Sizelyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12676847788254717165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-42226368749016033912012-08-13T02:28:32.751-07:002012-08-13T02:28:32.751-07:00Sam B-C - that's why I said as long as there&#...Sam B-C - that's why I said <i>as long as there's something 'obscene' about the scene</i><br /><br />SZ - I wasn't making an argument, I was asking a question about the law, which seems to me oddly drafted - if the potential fatal result of the scene I suggested is a problem, I'm sure a less fatal alternative could be imagined. One point is that injury to breasts etc doesn't have to involve the breasts being exposed or of themselves constituting the obscene part of the scene - it could be the woman is undressed from the waist down and something else is going on, while apparent injury is being done to her breasts. Another point is what is meant by 'act' - you imply it means something real and not simulated. How is the distinction made? What does 'likely' mean?Ron Sizelyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12676847788254717165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-73401780180157630062012-08-11T11:25:13.049-07:002012-08-11T11:25:13.049-07:00Congratulations on challenging this obscene law. I...Congratulations on challenging this obscene law. I wrote to the CPS to ask if they had reviewed hospital admissions as a result of sexual acts in order to determine the likelihood of their causing injury, and oddly enough they had not. Each of these cases is meant to be referred to the Director of Public Prosecution's office for authorisation before being taken to court, so if you want someone to talk to about this waste of taxpayers money, you know who to contact.DanielLondonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03339974259282493622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-86601806444796951992012-08-11T00:00:53.998-07:002012-08-11T00:00:53.998-07:00Is someone liable for the emails they receive from...Is someone liable for the emails they receive from others? How can communication work this way? Even if one has requested emails of a generally sexual nature, how can that be equated with requesting this particular image? It is a fundamental of communication that one does not control what others send, and the sender should be the one who is liable if a communication should be considered prohibited in some way. Otherwise it would be easy to mount a malicious attack on anyone by simply sending them prohibited emails. As we know, many of the emails everyone receives are unrequested spam, often of a sexual nature.John Jacksonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10929595264291809515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-33317786352290476632012-08-09T09:30:59.611-07:002012-08-09T09:30:59.611-07:00Well done Myles. In a sane society the verdict wou...Well done Myles. In a sane society the verdict would never have been in doubt.Timothy Marshal-Nicholshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10884182812764984572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-71043127141064076382012-08-08T23:07:07.017-07:002012-08-08T23:07:07.017-07:00Isn't the thing to do here is attack the incom...Isn't the thing to do here is attack the incompetent prosecutor who brought the case? Bring up their incompetence, try to ruin their post-government career, etc.Man Whohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04694337941215960236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-5531787744840040282012-08-08T15:29:44.724-07:002012-08-08T15:29:44.724-07:00Fisting is definitely 'not my brand', but ...Fisting is definitely 'not my brand', but the wording of the law is ridiculous! 'Normal' penetrative sex with a virgin is 100% guaranteed to cause a permanent injury (rupture of a hymen)- so I guess millions more prosecutions could be brought without a revision of this statute. I regularly have sex with a chap from Glasgow - I know full well it causes brain damage, all those blows to the head as it hits the headboard repeatedly, but to each his or her own.<br />So glad you've been cleared, but cannot help wondering who you upset sufficiently to have them root through your inbox and attempt to accuse you of being a paedo too (before a sensible jury were shown the 'evidence').Who Let Binding and Hoche back into Medicine????https://www.blogger.com/profile/00541156089092672817noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-90157922978921608672012-08-08T14:12:10.813-07:002012-08-08T14:12:10.813-07:00Congratulations Simon, I'm appalled that you h...Congratulations Simon, I'm appalled that you had to go through this, but well done for making as much as you have made public. That must have taken real bravery. Well done to the legal team around you too. I hope this doesn't screw the rest of your life up. Good luck.Balding Hikerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10540443805328180062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-67860077731343962892012-08-08T07:30:19.348-07:002012-08-08T07:30:19.348-07:00I just want to say congratulations and thank you f...I just want to say congratulations and thank you from a member of the public for hopefully getting this illiberal nonsense knocked on the headJonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05969510312798557163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-41656343679850949242012-08-07T04:10:39.379-07:002012-08-07T04:10:39.379-07:00For it to "result, or be likely to result in ...For it to "result, or be likely to result in serious injury to a person's" wherever the heck it would have to be a real bullet from a real gun - not a prop nor acted scene, and then yes, you would have a serious issue and it wouldn't come under the extreme pornography laws but under the laws currently affecting snuff films. Which I don't believe have been changed in quite some time. So your argument is a pretty invalid one.SZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09126415839520832074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-54105644373781502132012-08-07T03:34:47.764-07:002012-08-07T03:34:47.764-07:00I'm not EVEN going to comment on this one.I'm not EVEN going to comment on this one.Boyhoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12340214133476485442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-32057426755671946112012-08-06T07:49:13.698-07:002012-08-06T07:49:13.698-07:00Well I can't imagine anyone wanting to do it, ...Well I can't imagine anyone wanting to do it, though I suppose I am forced to concede that some people do. The response of the CPS seems extreme, it seems like a thing that should be nobody's business if done in private.Jayaravahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13783922534271559030noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-84436307076644065752012-08-06T06:14:05.441-07:002012-08-06T06:14:05.441-07:00Will he have a case to sue for damages after this?...Will he have a case to sue for damages after this? As it seemed he lost his livelihood over the whole affair.Zephhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09833608979664236256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-25997191497850524262012-08-05T13:53:20.057-07:002012-08-05T13:53:20.057-07:00Hmmm. What about childbirth? It kills quite a la...Hmmm. What about childbirth? It kills quite a large number.OldNick666https://www.blogger.com/profile/14294879367543721380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-25059529813831420402012-08-04T06:25:15.146-07:002012-08-04T06:25:15.146-07:00No, because elsewhere in the section it defines po...No, because elsewhere in the section it defines pornography (material intended solely or primarily for sexual purposes), and to be "extreme porn", it has to be porn as well as being extreme.Sam Barnett-Cormackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01904395421765346531noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-76450728897315302362012-08-03T15:17:31.059-07:002012-08-03T15:17:31.059-07:00"an act which results, or is likely to result..."an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person’s<br />anus, breasts or genitals”<br /><br />So if I watch a film of an actor firing a gun at an actress's heart, even though they're acting, and even though they're fully clothed, as long as there's something 'obscene' about the scene, I'm committing an offence.<br /><br />Really?Ron Sizelyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12676847788254717165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-54483961397123183222012-08-03T10:00:43.734-07:002012-08-03T10:00:43.734-07:00Serious injury, I could use my tallywhacker and ca...Serious injury, I could use my tallywhacker and cause serious injury. SMHHappyCabbiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15630488447310927132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-43622700009474612342012-08-02T11:46:43.761-07:002012-08-02T11:46:43.761-07:00Doesn't government have anything better to do ...Doesn't government have anything better to do than to harass the citizens that they are supposed to be protecting?InalienableWrightshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02108700971976990644noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-22886610347454212292012-07-31T14:52:16.108-07:002012-07-31T14:52:16.108-07:00Yet another nail in the justice systems coffin!
...Yet another nail in the justice systems coffin! <br /><br />And people wonder why we live in a lawless society, it's because of half baked cases like this, where the CPS really have nothing better to do, because they're laying idle because the magistrates courts are just there to act as the governments and local council dog's bodies to collect revenue from council tax and parking tickets. <br /><br />Simon, I really hope this case falls through.Design Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04258148618003583734noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-55788625183913037152012-07-31T13:42:12.675-07:002012-07-31T13:42:12.675-07:00"There were Ministry of Justice Guidelines sp..."There were Ministry of Justice Guidelines specifically on the extreme pornography legislation, but they seem to have disappeared from the internet, possibly disavowed."<br /><br />The document has been moved to http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/extreme-pornographic-images.pdf<br /><br />(It's a shame that this law wasn't "archived" too...)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-51764033982470904042012-07-31T06:20:13.118-07:002012-07-31T06:20:13.118-07:00I'm half tempted to tell the investigating off...I'm half tempted to tell the investigating officers, the CPS and the politicians who pushed through the ill thought out and seriously deffective laws to take this case and shove it up their backsides (without any lubrication). However based on recent events on Twitter and the such like that could potentially lead to my arrest and prossecution so I'll reframe from telling them that.<br /><br />Good luck to Simon Walsh. Yet another waste of taxpayers money when we're faced with a double dip recession, but we have to protect people from... erm...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-10389979438982003772012-07-31T03:55:58.522-07:002012-07-31T03:55:58.522-07:00Isn't it blatantly obvious that the police hav...Isn't it blatantly obvious that the police have basically manufactured a case against this guy out of whole cloth - possibly even to the extent of sending him incriminating images themselves, so they knew exactly where to find them - in order to remove a persistent thorn in their side? And that the Crown Persecution Service are going along with this because as far as they're concerned, political prosecutions that erode civil rights is what they do these days?<br /><br />I'm sick of hearing about crap like this. This is supposed to be a modern Western democracy; even if the police do take it into their heads to turn themselves into the Stasi, the rest of the legal system is supposed to notice and stop them, not give them every assistance.<br /><br />(Sorry if you can't publish this comment for legal reasons, but - GAH!)gwenhwyfaerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03775254923855147509noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8920850427843688264.post-69044580015089282272012-07-31T03:50:21.269-07:002012-07-31T03:50:21.269-07:00Salter was the archetypical authoritarian Labour M...Salter was the archetypical authoritarian Labour MP. he was a supporter of compulsory ID Cards and the forced registration of every person in the UK on the DNA Criminal Database. Fortunately he is no longer an MP however there are still plenty of others like him in the Labour Party. Which is the reason why I, as a previously staunch Labour voter, would never support Labour again.Stephenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05271564238765674951noreply@blogger.com